fix(attest-demo): silence fresh-install SQLite risk-warnings + fix 'Compliant' default (was red-but-IN_LANE) · v2.34.0
DEMO HARDENING (Marsh, tomorrow) — no risk indicators when they run it:
• The fresh-install 'no such table: tc_pipeline_gates / lens_rule_meta' errors
were the sqlite3 CLI writing to stderr (JS already caught the throw + used the
builtin default). Added stdio stderr='ignore' to the reads (pipeline-gates,
prompt-lens, reef-derivatives, spec-build) → a clean fresh-install terminal.
• The default scenario looked BROKEN: header said IN_LANE but the encircled was
red/borderline — because currentScenario defaulted to null → it showed the
STRATEGY two-node page PNGs, not the surgical faithful scenario. Now the UX
defaults currentScenario to the DEFAULT scenario, so the encircled MATCHES the
verdict (its own 17-region intent↔reality drift, mostly in-lane). Reset does the same.
• Renamed 'Faithful (IN_LANE)' → 'Compliant work · IN_LANE' so it no longer reads
like a reset button.
Verdict is CLEAN gzip-NCD (Chebyshev/king-move is only a displayed greek band).
Guards 31/31 (redpill-sequence 5/5 + airgap 26/26). Regen shows zero SQLite leaks.
Originating-Terminal: 📐 architect (VS Code)
Relevant-Rooms: 🔨 builder, 📐 architect, 🎩 operator
Story: 'bump so I can be sure it runs the full sequence without risk indicators' + 'Compliant sounds like reset, looks out of lane but is in lane.' Silenced the fresh-install DB errors and made the default encircled match its own IN_LANE verdict.
Receipt-Verified: σ=2.54 · cell=A · witness-agreement=GZIP_ONLY · lens=gzip · receipt=aef5a7c2
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EssMgKix9aZmZ5dxGPqYCW
npx thetacog-mcp attest-demoB2,A ▸ B2,C3 B2.Tactics.Deal × B1.Tactics.Speed → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 11 amber blocksA,A ▸ A2,A1 C.Operations × C.Operations → ~blog-content · blog post mdx breadcrumb · 10 green blocksA,C1 ▸ A1,C3 C.Operations × C2.Operations.Loop → deployment · deploy vercel build push · 6 green blocksB,A2 ▸ C,B2 C.Operations × B1.Tactics.Speed → infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 6 green blocksC2,C ▸ C3,A2 C3.Operations.Flow × A1.Strategy.Law → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 6 red blocksC2,B2 ▸ C3,C1 C3.Operations.Flow × B3.Tactics.Signal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 6 red blocksB2,C1 ▸ C1,C3 B3.Tactics.Signal × C2.Operations.Loop → ~infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 5 amber blocksA2,A ▸ A3,C A3.Strategy.Fund × B.Tactics → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 4 amber blocksA2,C1 ▸ A3,C3 A3.Strategy.Fund × C2.Operations.Loop → ~testing-gate · test jest guard gate · 4 amber blocksB3,A ▸ C1,C C1.Operations.Grid × B.Tactics → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 4 amber blocksC2,C2 ▸ C3,C3 C3.Operations.Flow × C3.Operations.Flow → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 4 red blocksA,C2 ▸ C,C2 B.Tactics × C2.Operations.Loop → pmu-walk · walk ballistic recursive on-chip · 3 amber blocksC2,A3 ▸ C3,B1 C3.Operations.Flow × B1.Tactics.Speed → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 3 red blocksA,C1 ▸ B,C1 B.Tactics × C1.Operations.Grid → pmu-reef · pmu reef ballistic walk · 2 green blocksA2,B2 ▸ A2,B3 A2.Strategy.Goal × B3.Tactics.Signal → ~infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 2 green blocksB,B ▸ C,C C.Operations × C.Operations → ~blog-content · blog post mdx breadcrumb · 2 amber blocksA2,B1 ▸ A3,B2 A3.Strategy.Fund × B2.Tactics.Deal → ~infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 2 amber blocksB1,B2 ▸ B2,B3 B2.Tactics.Deal × B3.Tactics.Signal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 2 red blocksC2,A ▸ C3,A C3.Operations.Flow × A.Strategy → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 2 red blocksA2,A3 A2.Strategy.Goal × A3.Strategy.Fund → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 green blockB3,B B3.Tactics.Signal × B.Tactics → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 green blockB3,A2 B3.Tactics.Signal × A2.Strategy.Goal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 green blockB3,C2 B3.Tactics.Signal × C2.Operations.Loop → ~infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 1 green blockA,B2 A.Strategy × B2.Tactics.Deal → mcp-crm · mcp crm lead card · 1 amber blockC,A3 C.Operations × A3.Strategy.Fund → scheduled-jobs · cron launchd schedule scheduled · 1 amber blockC,B2 C.Operations × B2.Tactics.Deal → testing-gate · test jest guard gate · 1 amber blockB2,C B2.Tactics.Deal × C.Operations → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 amber blockB2,A2 B2.Tactics.Deal × A2.Strategy.Goal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 amber blockB2,B2 B2.Tactics.Deal × B2.Tactics.Deal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 amber blockB2,C1 B2.Tactics.Deal × C1.Operations.Grid → ~infra-hooks · hook pre-commit post-commit launchd · 1 amber blockC1,A2 C1.Operations.Grid × A2.Strategy.Goal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 amber blockC1,B2 C1.Operations.Grid × B2.Tactics.Deal → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 amber blockC3,B C3.Operations.Flow × B.Tactics → ~comms-email · email comms newsletter telegram · 1 red block
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A,A The lattice we build today is what next year's underwriter inherits.B,B Tactics is the choice of which leverage to pull at which beat.C,C Operations is the loop that runs whether anyone watches.A1,A1 EU AI Act Article 14 requires human-on-the-loop oversight, with the supervisor able to interrupt the system atA2,A2 The target is the cell coordinate the system MUST occupy by end-of-quarter.A3,A3 Every dollar builds either the floor (substrate that lifts future bets) or the ceiling (cap on the next round)B1,B1 Latency is the price of a missed beat.B2,B2 The deal sets the exchange rate between two value substrates.B3,B3 Signal-to-noise is the inverse cube of bandwidth — narrow the channel, the message arrives; broaden it, recipiC1,C1 Power flows where the grid lets it.C2,C2 Each iteration is a hypothesis tested against the ground truth of the world.C3,C3 Flow is the rate at which committed work crosses the finish line.fix(attest-demo): silence fresh-install SQLite risk-warnings + fix 'Compliant' default (was red-but-IN_LANE) · v2.34.0
DEMO HARDENING (Marsh, tomorrow) — no risk indicators when they run it:
• The fresh-install 'no such table: tc_pipeline_gates / lens_rule_meta' errors
were the sqlite3 CLI writing to stderr (JS already caught the throw + used the
builtin default). Added stdio stderr='ignore' to the reads (pipeline-gates,
prompt-lens, reef-derivatives, spec-build) → a clean fresh-install terminal.
• The default scenario looked BROKEN: header said IN_LANE but the encircled was
red/borderline — because currentScenario defaulted to null → it showed the
STRATEGY two-node page PNGs, not the surgical faithful scenario. Now the UX
defaults currentScenario to the DEFAULT scenario, so the encircled MATCHES the
verdict (its own 17-region intent↔reality drift, mostly in-lane). Reset does the same.
• Renamed 'Faithful (IN_LANE)' → 'Compliant work · IN_LANE' so it no longer reads
like a reset button.
Verdict is CLEAN gzip-NCD (Chebyshev/king-move is only a displayed greek band).
Guards 31/31 (redpill-sequence 5/5 + airgap 26/26). Regen shows zero SQLite le
docs/pmu/attest-demo-report.html
docs/pmu/attest-demo-ux.html
packages/thetacog-mcp/package.json
scripts/pmu/attest-demo-ux.mjs
scripts/pmu/attest-scenarios.mjs
scripts/pmu/pipeline-gates.mjs
scripts/pmu/prompt-lens.mjs
scripts/pmu/reef-derivatives.mjs
scripts/pmu/spec-build.mjs| chain | ✅ reef sensed — 144 seeds → SimHash in 402ms · grid attached (input seed → SimHash sanity check) · ✅ on-chip 460.46ns/walk · 1.225ms · 9799254 walks/sec · 42 / 144 lit (measured on silicon, this commit) · ✅ triptych rendered · pipeline 2505ms · render 188ms · 518 XOR-friction nodes |
| hardware root of trust | serial CXMF9VMM29 · UUID 43C33AB6… · attest MFkwEwYHKoZIzj0CAQYIKoZIzj0D… (ecdsa-p256-sha256 · hw-derived fallback, weaker than Secure Enclave) |
| gate (XOR+popcount) | 0.5389 ns / driven comparison · walk @ gate rate 155.2 ns |
| cache witness | L1 2.01 ns · DRAM 137.95 ns · miss ×68.6 |
| daemon binary | sha256 b409b4c1dedd815b… (the attested silicon path) |
| run receipt | run-2026-07-15T03-13-47-572Z-ad2dd4d8 · payload ad66aa7030fdc77d… · band gold |
| timings | ingest 2276.4ms · definer-walk+σ 371ms · render 188ms · pipeline 2505ms · ingest = commit-scoped SENSING only (msg + changed files → lattice); deep seed authoring lives in the reef-self-loop, off the commit path |
| walks (this heatmap) | INTENT: 127 hops / 127 chip processes / 127 anchors lit, ended at A3,A2 · C2,C2 (ply 7 — the definers-of-definers) · REALITY: 108 hops / 108 chip processes / 108 anchors lit, ended at C1,B2 (ply 8 — the definers-of-definers) · walks concentrate at block-heads by the ShortLex-ascending follow |
| per-stage | resolve 0.1ms · invariants 2ms · sense 2276.3ms · sigma 0.2ms · binarize 0ms · project 9.8ms · xor 0ms · walk 55.4ms · claudbridge 83.8ms |
| walk start | B,A1 (STABLE attractor) · 235 hops · maxPly 8 |
| σ — defined by its inputs | σ = (cos(intentCloud, realityCloud) − μ of 12 bit-shuffled-reality impostor walks) / sd · INPUTS: intent 48 claims @ θ 0.703 (msg + 2 docs + 0 tests + ideal-case spec + SPEC intent) · reality 33 claims @ θ 0.703 (6 code) · walk topK 2 decay 0.5 ply≤8 budget 2500ms · seed-lib 8a4b87022885 — σ comparisons are only valid at equal inputs |
| σ raw | heat-cosine 0.0114 vs random 0.064 → σ_spec-delta · noise · no measurable relation between the work and the declared spec |
| shortlex-3 projection | 256ms · intent zones 0/12/1694 (+338 cross) · reality zones 0/1/829 (+129 cross) · zone 3 = candidate children, pre-ratchet |
| orthogonality (seed 144) | 144/144 unique · 143/144 openings · pairwise sim 0.367 · junk 0 |
| intent documents | attest-demo-report.html · attest-demo-ux.html |
Produced on the chip by the running pipeline (scripts/pmu/pipeline.mjs → runPipeline → walk + xor), commit-scoped · on-chip per-walk 460.46ns (this commit). Recompute: node scripts/pmu/commit-triptych.mjs --commit cc0ffb2bd
Commit artifacts (open on a computer — Gmail mobile won't follow file:// links; the inline images above are the phone-viewable form): reef grid · this triptych · the HDL — all three are also attached to this email.
--- spec_id: reef-the-spec-and-sign to_room: laboratory from_room: operator reef_ref: CLAUDE.md (PMU competence-walk HARD RULE) + scripts/pmu/attest-demo.mjs originating_commit: 5c385860b status: draft --- # Laboratory 🧪 — Reef-the-spec + A↔B signing → the delegation drift receipt ## WHY (authored in Operator) The delegation itself should be **measured**, not trusted. The author room (actor) signs the spec as intent; the executing room (patient) signs delivered work; the real on-chip walk measures the drift = "did the room build what the spec asked." That makes the actor–patient pair the delegation subdivision, and dogfoods the signing mesh locally as a rehearsal for the internet-wide version. This is also what unblocks Builder's R6. ## REQUIREMENTS (falsifiable) - **R1 — reef-from-spec.** A command that compiles an arbitrary markdown spec → a reef seeded from *its own* vocabulary (NOT the generic 144-tile library). *Check:* feeding `builder-npx-underwriter-package.md` yields a reef whose anchors come from that spec. - **R2 — A↔B signing.** Node A (author room) ed25519-signs the reef/intent commitment; node B (executing room) signs the delivered-work payload. The two signatures + the drift receipt form one transaction. *Check:* two distinct host keys appear on the receipt. - **R3 — The REAL walk (HARD RULE).** Run the **real recursive on-chip ballistic walk** (`pmu-onchip --ballistic`, connectivity lattice, row→column→row recursion) with spec=intent, delivered-work=reality. **NEVER** the analytic `mode=converged`/diffusion shortcut, a diagonal/identity grid, a JS BFS, or Monte-Carlo-as-the-walk. Speed is a correctness signal (~14ms, not ~21s). *Check:* `tests/pmu-simulator/competence-walk-is-real.test.mjs` stays green; the walk propagates past ply 1. - **R4 — Drift receipt.** Output = a signed receipt stating whether the delivered work cohered with the spec (σ + verdict + triptych). *Check:* run Spec A as reef, Builder's package as payload → a signed σ. - **R5 — Local mesh dogfood.** Run the whole A↔B loop on this repo's rooms locally, as the rehearsal for the internet-wide mesh. *Check:* a local two-node transaction completes end-to-end. ## ACCEPTANCE Take this delegation set as the test: Spec A (reef/intent) signed by Operator-as-node-A, Builder's delivered npx package (reality) signed by Builder-as-node-B → the real ballistic walk produces a signed drift receipt with a σ that says whether Builder built what the spec asked. Respect the competence-walk HARD RULE; that's the whole differentiator.