💳 Fund Autonomy Ledgernot signed in🔗 The backup record🔑 Sign in

Open Integration Standard · Protocol 144

The terms are public. So you never have to take our word for it for them.

This is the open specification under which physical trust telemetry — a signed receipt of whether an AI agent stayed in the lane it was given, that anyone can recompute — integrates with a commercial underwriting facility. It is published, not negotiated in the dark — the exact mathematical and operational terms, open to any facility that meets the technical threshold.

Notice

This document is an open, non-binding integration standard and letter of intent. It is not a binding offer, not a solicitation of securities, and not a custody or market-making service. Nothing here creates an obligation on any party until a bilateral agreement is executed. ThetaDriven Inc. remains an attestation oracle — it never custodies a work-product byte.

Run it before you read the terms

Every claim in this standard traces to something you can execute right now. The gate is free to install; the receipt it mints recomputes on your own machine. You are not asked to take the signal on faith — you are asked to reproduce it.

$ npx thetacog-mcp attest-demo
→ signed receipt · IN_ROLE allow · OFF_DOMAIN escalate · UNPLACEABLE block

The install and the measurement are free and open-source (MIT); only the financialization/attestation layer is licensed. To recompute a receipt yourself, clone the public repository at the commit the receipt names and run:

$ git clone https://github.com/wiber/thetacog-mcp.git && cd thetacog-mcp
$ node scripts/vna/recompute-receipt.mjs --receipt <file>
→ match (exit 0) · MISMATCH (exit 1) · UNMEASURED (exit 2)

2.27 s to recompute a public receipt in a fresh clone (one run, 2026-09-28). The published npm package (2.54.0) does not carry this command; npx thetacog-mcp recompute-receipt lands with 2.55.0.

The standard

What a qualifying facility integrates. Four terms, each independently verifiable — the math, the hardware, and the transaction, with the philosophy left in the book where it belongs.

  1. Scale-invariant Fractal Identity Map. Each agent's intended boundary is expressed as a coordinate on a fixed 144-node resolution lattice, identical at every scale, so “in-lane” is a decidable placement rather than a subjective judgment.
  2. Hardware-level telemetry. Drift is sensed against physical performance-counter measurement on hardware the deployer owns (BYOD) — not a model's self-report. The sensor hits metal; the reading is a physical fact, not an opinion.
  3. Re-runnable, LLM-free receipt. Each action mints a signed receipt that is a pure function of the action. No language model sits in the verdict path, so the same input yields the same receipt for you and for a stranger — the placement is provable and re-runnable.
  4. Transferable integration license. A fixed per-agent license, with a 10% re-registration fee on transfer through ThetaDriven — the single commission knob. Terms are the same ones published at /pricing; nothing here is priced in the dark.

How an underwriting engine queries it — the Richter scale, not the kill-switch

A facility's underwriting engine queries the lattice to read whether a client's agent stayed in its commanded lane. A fleet-wide lane-jump is the correlated signal an accumulation model needs — the one thing that makes autonomous-agent liability writable at all: it turns an uncorrelated-because-invisible tail into a countable, signed event.

We make no claim to stop the drift. A Richter scale doesn't stop the earthquake — it makes it parametric, a number a policy or a bond can pay out on. We provide the LLM-free, recomputable measurement that the boundary was crossed — 0.90 in/out-domain separation, 10/10 out-of-domain rejection, 4.48σ against a scrambled null, with the honest open inch (paraphrase-invariance 0.30) published rather than hidden. What you build on that signal — an automated checker, a human-in-the-loop fallback — is yours.

That is why it survives counsel, not just diligence: once a decidable ruler exists, not consulting it is the negligence — the T.J. Hooper standard. Hundreds of live receipts recompute in the open at /commit. The boundary is the product, not a limitation of it.

Status

Open for bilateral execution with any qualifying commercial underwriting facility. This is a live, actively-maintained standard, not a one-time letter. First-access priority is determined by completion of the physical telemetry audit package — the technical threshold, not a relationship.

No partner facility is named on this page. When one executes and consents to disclosure, it is recorded here, sourced — never before. The absence of a name is the standard working as designed, not the absence of a standard.

thetadriven.com/standard • Protocol 144 • Open · non-binding · recompute every term yourself • US Patent App. 19/637,714

gemsedu.com #1 ▼9.6%moonshotscapital.com #2 ▼9.7%differential.vc #3 ▲2.5%leadedgecapital.com #4 ▼4.2%dometic.com #5 ▼0.5%thecignagroup.com #6 ▲12.9%sigma.se #7 ▼11.1%karlsborg.se #8 ▼6.7%emiratesnbd.com #9 ▲6.5%ltu.se #10 ▲3.1%teneo.com #11 ▼1.9%rytmus.se #12 ▲23.1%scor.com #13 ▲37%championacaustin.com #14 ▲5.6%reed.com #15 ▲7%apcoworldwide.com #16 ▼11.5%svenskakyrkan.se #17 ▲1.4%clarionschool.com #18 ▼10.8%amseliplaw.com #19 ▼15.5%parkcity.org #20 ▲38.5%anthonypllc.com #21 ▼9.2%sigeducation.com #22 ▼6%state.gov #23 ▼7%scania.com #24 ▼16.9%easystem.se #25 ▲4.2%pernod-ricard-china.com #26 ▲3.9%brodit.se #27 ▼6.9%addition.com #28 ▲28%khda.gov.ae #29 ▲6.9%ericsson.com #30 ▼13.5%baylor.edu #31 ▲16.5%wsp.com #32 ▲0.9%dubaiholding.com #33 ▼4.9%bdtmsd.com #34 ▼2.9%innoventureseducation.com #35 ▼12.3%bancamediolanum.it #36 ▲296.6%expediagroup.com #37 ▼6.5%eosvc.com #38 ▲4.2%ecoclean-group.net #39 ▲151%lfg.com #40 ▼9.1%bakerbotts.com #41 ▲53%siemens.com #42 ▲7%mit.edu #43 ▲3.8%crslimited.com #44 ▲1.1%louisville.edu #45 ▲56.9%americancenteruae.com #46 ▼8.3%cablevision.com #47 ▼2.5%tyrolit.com #48 ▲123.5%rackspace.com #49 ▼7.6%atriumhealth.org #50 ▼6.8%upandrunningdubai.com #51 ▼15.1%newyorklife.com #52 ▲0.5%its.jnj.com #53 ▼14.2%inspiralia.com #54 ▲7%winningtemp.se #55 ▼4%sunstarstrategic.com #56 ▼12.3%linkedin.com #57 ▲12.9%volvo.com #58 ▼12.5%gunnebo.com #59 ▼18.3%statefarm.com #60 ▼10.3%oryxworld.com #61 ▼24.9%munichre.com #62 ▼10.9%neweratech.com #63 ▼19%bermanauditadvisorycpa.com #64 ▼3.7%jcdecaux.ae #65 ▼2.8%sc.com #66 ▼15.2%marsh.com #67 ▼11.3%aresmgmt.com #68 ▲0.3%fox.com #69 ▲33.8%insureai.co #70 ▼24.9%nsigroup.org #71 0.0%jkj.com #72 ▼1.5%peraco.com.au #73 ▲159.3%se.abb.com #74 ▼22.1%emerson.com #75 ▲1.4%jcdecaux.com #76 ▼16.6%conning.com #77 ▼7.6%luxcapital.com #78 ▼8.9%schmuhlbrothers.com #79 ▲33.1%camarda.com #80 ▲92.7%students.rcsj.edu #81 ▲7.5%jsx.com #82 ▲83.6%pacemetals.com #83 ▼19.9%artvillagenursery.com #84 ▼24.9%bartec.com #85 ▲33.7%mindshareworld.com #86 ▲102.2%rakbank.ae #87 ▲13.5%scnsoft.com #88 ▲24.3%muskegoncc.edu #89 ▲54.7%lbl.gov #90 ▼24.9%stoughtontrailers.com #91 ▲111.8%aig.com #92 ▼14.1%xprize.org #93 ▼4.7%dubailand.gov.ae #94 ▲56.5%krausanderson.com #95 ▲29.4%tetrapak.com #96 ▼7.9%hsph.harvard.edu #97 ▼24.9%nyu.edu #98 ▼12.3%trenchlaw.com #99 ▼24.9%mckoolsmith.com #100 ▼24.9%gemsedu.com #1 ▼9.6%moonshotscapital.com #2 ▼9.7%differential.vc #3 ▲2.5%leadedgecapital.com #4 ▼4.2%dometic.com #5 ▼0.5%thecignagroup.com #6 ▲12.9%sigma.se #7 ▼11.1%karlsborg.se #8 ▼6.7%emiratesnbd.com #9 ▲6.5%ltu.se #10 ▲3.1%teneo.com #11 ▼1.9%rytmus.se #12 ▲23.1%scor.com #13 ▲37%championacaustin.com #14 ▲5.6%reed.com #15 ▲7%apcoworldwide.com #16 ▼11.5%svenskakyrkan.se #17 ▲1.4%clarionschool.com #18 ▼10.8%amseliplaw.com #19 ▼15.5%parkcity.org #20 ▲38.5%anthonypllc.com #21 ▼9.2%sigeducation.com #22 ▼6%state.gov #23 ▼7%scania.com #24 ▼16.9%easystem.se #25 ▲4.2%pernod-ricard-china.com #26 ▲3.9%brodit.se #27 ▼6.9%addition.com #28 ▲28%khda.gov.ae #29 ▲6.9%ericsson.com #30 ▼13.5%baylor.edu #31 ▲16.5%wsp.com #32 ▲0.9%dubaiholding.com #33 ▼4.9%bdtmsd.com #34 ▼2.9%innoventureseducation.com #35 ▼12.3%bancamediolanum.it #36 ▲296.6%expediagroup.com #37 ▼6.5%eosvc.com #38 ▲4.2%ecoclean-group.net #39 ▲151%lfg.com #40 ▼9.1%bakerbotts.com #41 ▲53%siemens.com #42 ▲7%mit.edu #43 ▲3.8%crslimited.com #44 ▲1.1%louisville.edu #45 ▲56.9%americancenteruae.com #46 ▼8.3%cablevision.com #47 ▼2.5%tyrolit.com #48 ▲123.5%rackspace.com #49 ▼7.6%atriumhealth.org #50 ▼6.8%upandrunningdubai.com #51 ▼15.1%newyorklife.com #52 ▲0.5%its.jnj.com #53 ▼14.2%inspiralia.com #54 ▲7%winningtemp.se #55 ▼4%sunstarstrategic.com #56 ▼12.3%linkedin.com #57 ▲12.9%volvo.com #58 ▼12.5%gunnebo.com #59 ▼18.3%statefarm.com #60 ▼10.3%oryxworld.com #61 ▼24.9%munichre.com #62 ▼10.9%neweratech.com #63 ▼19%bermanauditadvisorycpa.com #64 ▼3.7%jcdecaux.ae #65 ▼2.8%sc.com #66 ▼15.2%marsh.com #67 ▼11.3%aresmgmt.com #68 ▲0.3%fox.com #69 ▲33.8%insureai.co #70 ▼24.9%nsigroup.org #71 0.0%jkj.com #72 ▼1.5%peraco.com.au #73 ▲159.3%se.abb.com #74 ▼22.1%emerson.com #75 ▲1.4%jcdecaux.com #76 ▼16.6%conning.com #77 ▼7.6%luxcapital.com #78 ▼8.9%schmuhlbrothers.com #79 ▲33.1%camarda.com #80 ▲92.7%students.rcsj.edu #81 ▲7.5%jsx.com #82 ▲83.6%pacemetals.com #83 ▼19.9%artvillagenursery.com #84 ▼24.9%bartec.com #85 ▲33.7%mindshareworld.com #86 ▲102.2%rakbank.ae #87 ▲13.5%scnsoft.com #88 ▲24.3%muskegoncc.edu #89 ▲54.7%lbl.gov #90 ▼24.9%stoughtontrailers.com #91 ▲111.8%aig.com #92 ▼14.1%xprize.org #93 ▼4.7%dubailand.gov.ae #94 ▲56.5%krausanderson.com #95 ▲29.4%tetrapak.com #96 ▼7.9%hsph.harvard.edu #97 ▼24.9%nyu.edu #98 ▼12.3%trenchlaw.com #99 ▼24.9%mckoolsmith.com #100 ▼24.9%